generalized linear mixed-effects model glmer Search Results


generalized linear mixed-effects model glmer  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc generalized linear mixed-effects model glmer
Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Model Glmer, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalized linear mixed-effects model glmer/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed-effects model glmer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
general linear mixed effects models using matlab's fitglme  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc general linear mixed effects models using matlab's fitglme
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
General Linear Mixed Effects Models Using Matlab's Fitglme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/general linear mixed effects models using matlab's fitglme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
general linear mixed effects models using matlab's fitglme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
generalized linear mixed-effect models (glme)  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc generalized linear mixed-effect models (glme)
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Models (Glme), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalized linear mixed-effect models (glme)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed-effect models (glme) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mixed effects glme model  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc mixed effects glme model
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Mixed Effects Glme Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed effects glme model/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed effects glme model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
generalised linear mixed-effects models  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc generalised linear mixed-effects models
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Generalised Linear Mixed Effects Models, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalised linear mixed-effects models/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalised linear mixed-effects models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
generalized linear mixed effect models glmem  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc generalized linear mixed effect models glmem
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Models Glmem, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalized linear mixed effect models glmem/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed effect models glmem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
glme matlab function fitglme  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc glme matlab function fitglme
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Glme Matlab Function Fitglme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glme matlab function fitglme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glme matlab function fitglme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab function fitglme  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab function fitglme
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Matlab Function Fitglme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab function fitglme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab function fitglme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
v13 menbreg command  (STATA Corporation)
90
STATA Corporation v13 menbreg command
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
V13 Menbreg Command, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/v13 menbreg command/product/STATA Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
v13 menbreg command - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
general linear mixed effect model  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute general linear mixed effect model
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
General Linear Mixed Effect Model, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/general linear mixed effect model/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
general linear mixed effect model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
generalized linear mixed-effects model  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc generalized linear mixed-effects model
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalized linear mixed-effects model/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed-effects model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
glme  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc glme
Effect sizes from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> <t>mixed</t> model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).
Glme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Effect sizes from a general linear mixed model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Persistent activity in human parietal cortex mediates perceptual choice repetition bias

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33237-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect sizes from a general linear mixed model (see “Methods”) estimating impact of stimulus category ( a ), choice ( b – d ), and action ( e – h ) on MEG power, in different regions and frequency bands. a Effect of current stimulus category on gamma (top) and alpha (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). b As a , but for effect of previous choice in the reference interval. c As b , but for test stimulus interval. d Comparison of choice history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Group effect = 0.55328, CI [0.19342, 0.91314], p = 0.00258. e Effect of current action preparation on gamma (top) and beta (bottom) power during test stimulus ( n = 60). f As e , but for effect of previous action during reference interval. g As f , but for the test interval. h Comparison of action history signals between alternators ( n = 25; orange) and repeaters ( n = 34; purple). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals; *0.01 < p < 0.05 (no such effect present); **0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; filled markers, p < 0.05 (all p values FDR corrected).

Article Snippet: We used general linear mixed effects models (GLMEs, using Matlab’s fitglme ) to quantify the effect of choice history on single-trial power modulation values across all source-level ROIs, frequency ranges and the above-defined time windows.

Techniques: Comparison

Time-resolved effect sizes from a general linear mixed model (see “Methods”), separately for both subgroups. a Effect of current and previous choice on IPS2/3 gamma-band activity. b Effect of current and previous choice on IPS0/1 alpha-band activity. c Effect of current and previous action on motor lateralization (pooled signal from M1, PMd/v, IPS/PCeS) in the beta-band. Lower markers indicate timepoints where the fixed effect is significantly different within each group, or between groups ( p < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Persistent activity in human parietal cortex mediates perceptual choice repetition bias

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33237-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Time-resolved effect sizes from a general linear mixed model (see “Methods”), separately for both subgroups. a Effect of current and previous choice on IPS2/3 gamma-band activity. b Effect of current and previous choice on IPS0/1 alpha-band activity. c Effect of current and previous action on motor lateralization (pooled signal from M1, PMd/v, IPS/PCeS) in the beta-band. Lower markers indicate timepoints where the fixed effect is significantly different within each group, or between groups ( p < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Data are shown as average fixed effect size +/− 95% confidence intervals.

Article Snippet: We used general linear mixed effects models (GLMEs, using Matlab’s fitglme ) to quantify the effect of choice history on single-trial power modulation values across all source-level ROIs, frequency ranges and the above-defined time windows.

Techniques: Activity Assay